Recent ‘Living Planet’ report published by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has stated that the current natural resources depletion is the worst in human history. Many species have extinct in past two decades at an alarming rate. The demand for resources had never been greater before. It cautioned that if the need continued at the current scale, two planets would be needed to meet global demand by 2050. Another interesting fact is if the world populations live the UK’s lifestyle, three planets would be needed to support their needs.
This report was created based on ‘Ecological Footprint’, an indicator based on measure of human demand on the natural world. Living Planet Index, assesses the health of the planet’s ecosystems, was another indicator.
For sustainability, the planet is only able to meet consumption levels of 1.8 global hectares per person. Due to the consumption rate, mostly by developed countries, the global footprint exceeded the earth’s biocapacity by 25% in 2003, which meant that the Earth could no longer carry on with the demands being placed upon it.
Looking at the trend of consumption and depletion, if Nepal ever gets her problem sorted and proceeds towards development, there won’t be any resources left to fuel it. Third world countries would never get an opportunity to live a life that people in developed countries are living. It’s hard to imagine the world in that condition; we will see more bloodsheds than ever.
Majority of reports published alarming the ecosystem depletion is generally blamed to be too pessimistic. It is said that they don’t consider the fact that with technological advancements some of these issues can be sorted.
Although, there might be a hope for technological advancements, but no one can debate that we definitely are exerting more pressure on the ecosystem affecting its sustainability. 


problematic bro, what is it with first world living that if the supposed “third worlders” dont have it, its going to turn into a bloodshed???? please enlighten me!!! this is frustrating man, and coming frm u….
Sabin.
P.S. you dont have to respond to this, i know this comment was posted waayyyy back, so u may no longer have any steam left in ur engine to respond to this particular comment..for some reasons i m finding ur blog site as a good break…kudos to u!!!
Sabin Bro,
I bet you agree on the unfair share of resources. What do you think the current wars (eg Iraq) are for, they certainly are not just for restoring peace in those countries.
Coming back to my post, with limited resources remaining, it will be like what Darwin said “survival of the fittest”. That’s where the bloodshed come from.
Couldnt agree more bro, what i find problematic was u stating…if we cannot afford to live the way the western world does, its going to turn to a bloodshed…or something along those lines that seemed to privilege one lifestyle over another….now what i m trying to drive home is there’d be a bloodshed definitely if there’s no adequate resources to continue sustaining our ‘own’ lifestyle, definitely not somebody else’s…